RSS

William Lane Craig, Evolution and My Own Recent Doubts and Reading

29 Dec

Ever since I finished reading Alvin Plantinga’s book Where the Conflict Really Lies (incidentally, the publisher, Oxford University Press, is out of stock until sometime next week) I’ve been on a science kick. I’m about half way through Brian Greene’s The Fabric of the Cosmos which has been a fascinating read. I just finished The Language of Science and Faith edited by Karl W. Giberson and Francis S. Collins which I found extremely helpful even if I was unhappy with some portions of it. I recently ordered another book by Karl Giberson called Saving Darwin: How to Be a Christian and Believe in Evolution. I was especially intrigued by Giberson’s story since he was originally inspired by Henry Morris and planned to get a PhD in physics and then go to work at Morris’ recently created Institute for Creation Research. But in the course of his studies he was persuaded that Morris was wrong and he became a believer in evolution. He says he would describe the views of Morris as “sophomoric in the most literal sense of the word, as I watched it wilt over the course of my sophomore year in college.” (6) I also dug out of my library two other books which I’ve found useful. One of those is The Evolution Controversy: A Survey of Competing Theories by Thomas B. Fowler and Daniel Kuebler. This book can get fairly technical but it provides a nice survey with a focus on four principal views: Neo-Darwinian, Creationist, Intelligent Design and Meta-Darwinian. The second book is A Science and Religion Primer edited by Heidi A. Campell and Heather Looy.  This book is in a dictionary format where words, concepts and people are explained and put into the context of the discussion between science and religion. Each entry contains a brief explanation followed by “Key points/challenges,” and then an annotated list of books for further reading. The last two I’ve used more as reference works than actually reading them through.

I’ve never been a believer in evolution but I’m beginning to rethink the issue. In my curiosity I wondered what one of my heroes, William Lane Craig, believed. I knew this was not one of his specialties but wondered none the less if he had some leanings. As it turns out he does though he describes himself as “somewhat agnostic” on the issue. In this clip of a debate he had with Christopher DiCarlo Craig is asked by DiCarlo what he believes about evolution. Craig responded that he is “somewhere between progressive creationism and theistic evolution” although he says he has “no hard and fast position.”

Do you have any suggestions of books that you’ve found particularly helpful in this area?

Some titles I’ve read but it’s been years (for example, Darwin on Trial and Defeating Darwinism by Philip Johnson andChristianity and the Nature of Science by J. P. Moreland). I’ve also read The Farce of Evolution by Hank Hanegraaf but was unimpressed which I suspected I would be before I started it. I did work my way through Darwin’s Black Box by Michael J. Behe and will probably give that a second look. A couple of years ago I waded through (barely keeping my head above water some of the time) Signature in the Cell by Stephen Meyer (see here for a post on my early approach to the book). Even farther back in my reading (and most of which I’ve probably forgot) I read Blueprints: Solving the Mystery of Evolution by Maitland Edey and Donald Johanson and Origins Reconsidered: In Search of What Makes Us Human by Richard Leakey and Roger Lewin. Both of these titles are very pro-evolution. Obviously I was not impressed at the time with the case they made. However, looking back I suspect I was not really open to hearing what they had to say.

 

About Louis

I am a 1997 graduate of Trinity Evangelical Divinity School in Deerfield Illinois. I majored in Christian Theology with a cognate in Church History. I have worked for Baker Book House since September 2000.
13 Comments

Posted by on December 29, 2011 in Apologetics, Science, William Lane Craig

 

13 Responses to William Lane Craig, Evolution and My Own Recent Doubts and Reading

  1. Paul D. Adams

    December 29, 2011 at 9:18 am

    Thanks for this, Louis. I just recently finished Plantinga’s Conflict as well and have two questions: 1) Curious what would be Craig’s thoughts on Plantinga’s Conflict and 2) Does/Can theistic evolution fall within the bounds of orthodoxy? [though I have a suspicion what the answer is on the latter]

    I’ve read Philip Johnson’s and J. P. Moreland’s titles you mention and have dabbled with some others as well, but I think the issues are as much hermeneutic as they are methodological when it comes to evolution versus creationism. Clearly, however, no theistic evolutionist would endorse scientific naturalism (or some kind of metaphysical materialism).

     
    • Louis

      December 30, 2011 at 9:08 pm

      Both are good questions Paul. I suspect Craig would be quite happy with Plantinga’s book given the esteem he has for him. Given the clip that I played of Craig on the 29th I know Craig would believe that theistic evolution safely falls within the boundaries of orthodoxy. I would agree. Your final sentence is spot on.

       
  2. sahelanthropus

    December 29, 2011 at 9:51 am

    That’s a very tactical answer from WLC. Since he gets support from many Christians, from creationists to theistic evolutionists, it is wise to not alienate either demographic by siding with the other.

     
    • Louis

      December 30, 2011 at 9:04 pm

      I don’t want to read too much between the lines of your comment but I don’t think Craig is trying to be tactical as much as he’s acknowledging that he’s not examined the issues with sufficient depth to come to a firm conclusion. He certainly makes his views known when it comes to the age of the universe and the earth (both very old).

       
      • sahelanthropus

        January 2, 2012 at 1:37 pm

        I don’t mean to imply that he is being somehow deceitful, just very particular with his phraseology. This doesn’t make what he’s trying to say as clear as one would like.

         
        • Louis

          January 4, 2012 at 10:07 pm

          Thanks for the clarification. I think you’re right.

           
  3. Adam Forrest (Zondervan employee)

    December 30, 2011 at 1:09 pm

    Louis, thank you for this honest and helpful survey of your reading.

    You and commenter Paul D. Adams got me thinking about how Christians and non-Christians frame the evolution question. I agree with Mr. Adams that the question of evolution is as much hermeneutic as it is methodological, in other words, just as much an issue of biblical interpretation as it is of scientific exploration.

    One reason I’m interested in our framework for thinking about evolution is Michael Polanyi. Are you familiar with him? A fascinating scientist who believed (to the best of my understanding) that all knowledge arises from commitments — for example, even when we claim objective knowledge from what we can observe, we’re trusting the reliability of our senses, brain functioning, and environment (Wikipedia on this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Polanyi#All_knowing_is_personal). So, if faith is a part of the scientific method, then it’s unhelpful to pursue the evolution question as one of “faith vs. science.”

    Regarding Mr. Adams’ point about the hermeneutic aspect, the best commentary I’ve found on Scripture’s creation texts are by John Walton, whom it was my pleasure to hear speak at your store, Louis! (Walton was talking about “The Lost World of Genesis One,” which is brief and clear, and his updated “Genesis 1 as Ancient Cosmology.”)

    Does anyone know of a good book that presents a holistic framework for thinking and arguing about evolution? If one doesn’t exist then I may have to quit my job at Zondervan try to write it myself. :-)

    -Adam

    PS: Methodological is to hermeneutic, as methodologic is to hermeneutical. Zing!

     
    • Paul D. Adams

      December 30, 2011 at 6:29 pm

      Thanks, for interacting here Adam. I cannot recommend highly enough Alvin Plantinga’s book Where the Conflict Really Lies. Of course, Walton is the best, too!

      P.S. I learn everything I know from Louis ;-)

       
    • Louis

      December 30, 2011 at 9:10 pm

      Thanks Adam for your comment. I’ve not read anything by Polanyi but I’ve seen his name quite a bit in some of my other readings. Don’t quit with Zondervan–just write the book. Maybe Z will publish it!

       
  4. craighurst

    January 3, 2012 at 3:15 pm

    This is an issue I have struggled with for years. I am meeting with a friend this week over lunch to discuss our questions on this very thing.

     
    • Louis

      January 4, 2012 at 10:07 pm

      Hi Craig,
      I would very interested in knowing how your conversation goes. If you’re open send me an email.

       
  5. Annette Constance Williams

    March 28, 2012 at 6:46 am

    Came across this discussion somewhat after the fact, so may go unnoticed, but hasn’t anybody read Darwin’s “The Origin of Species”?

     
    • Louis

      March 28, 2012 at 10:46 pm

      Hi Annette,
      Most probably have not read Darwin’s classic. I’ve started it a couple of times but have never finished it. I really should.

       

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 87 other followers